Add caption |
To conclude, I personally
feel that keeping pets has more benefits than
drawbacks.
Nowadays, Eco tourism is often being quoted as green tourism and it fast gaining prominence around the world. Many environmentalists and governments have started professing about the benefits of this branch of travelling, while there are several staunch critics who feel that Eco tourism is actually generating more problems than providing solutions.
Eco tourism is believed to be beneficial in many ways, as it does not exploit and disturb the sanctity of the location and the areas surrounding the sites being visited by the tourists. The green tourism also proves helpful for the locals living in that specific territory as it strives to involve locals living in and around the site of interest which ensures employment and self sufficiency for the local inhabitants. This in turn also prevents influx of outsiders in these areas thus helping in preserving the sanctity of the area.
Besides this, the eco tourism is also playing an important role in creating awareness about the importance of preserving environment. The areas being explored as part of nature tourist sites and spots are not developed on lines with the commercial tourism, i.e. they are left untouched and untamed. Educational travel based on natural attractions is also proving to be a promising medium of promoting social, economic, and environmental goals especially in developing nations.
However, nature tourism is also leading to destruction of forest and marine habitats and several wild species are being driven to the brink of extinction due to pressures created by of illegal hunting, logging, agriculture, and fishing. Furthermore, the poor nations who are maintaining these locations lack appropriate funding sources to manage and preserve them.
To conclude, I personally feel that although nature tourism has many demerits, its benefits cannot be overlooked and ignored.
Some people say that having a lot of TV channels is good, while others argue that it reduces the quality of programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Write at least in 250 words with relevant examples from your own experience.
The advent and subsequent spread of electronic audio visual entertainment, like television has bought in a renaissance of sorts – where the entertainment has become audience centric – and has led to rise in number of television channels that target specific segments. This has also led to deterioration in the quality of programs being aired.
An increment in number of channels is a result of innovative program planning undertaken by television studios producing and airing shows to suit the taste of targeted audience so that people - not intending to watch unwanted programs- do not need to switch off their television sets. The channels being aired have become subject specific, for instance, the channels associated with travel and lifestyle continuously show programs on various topics connected to this domain. This helps the viewers in gaining more knowledge in their area of interest, besides entertaining themselves.
Moreover, more television channels means broader perspective and wider choice of programs and presentations – where each channel tries to present an event or a happening from a different angle – which off course prove very advantageous for the viewers; as they are able to gather more information and form a well-informed opinion.
However, the sudden mushrooming of the television channels has also led to deterioration of the quality of the programs being aired. The channels, in a bid to overcome their competition, try to include more and more programs in the iternary schedule, most of which lack imagination, resourcefulness and freshness. Every other show, especially the television serials and music shows look stale and lack taste.
To sum up, I personally feel that though a sudden explosion in number of channels may have affected the quality to an extent, nevertheless, this trend has enabled audience to watch and enjoy the shows it wants.